Extended Stability of Isoproterenol Hydrochloride Injection in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags Stored in Amber Ultraviolet Light Blocking Bags.

Purpose:Evaluate the stability of isoproterenol hydrochloride injection in 0.9% sodium chloride in polyvinyl chloride bags for up to 90 days. Methods: Dilutions of isoproterenol hydrochloride injection to a concentration of 4 µg/mL were performed under aseptic conditions. The bags were stored in amber ultraviolet light blocking bags at room temperature (23°C-25°C) or under refrigeration (3°C-5°C). Three samples of each preparation and storage environment were analyzed on days 0, 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90. Physical stability was performed by visual examination. The pH was assessed at baseline, each analysis day, and upon final degradation evaluation. Sterility of the samples was not assessed. Chemical stability of isoproterenol hydrochloride was evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were considered stable if there was <10% degradation of the initial concentration. Results: Isoproterenol hydrochloride diluted to 4 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection was physically stable throughout the study. No precipitation was observed. At days 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90 all bags diluted to 4 µg/mL had <10% degradation when stored under refrigeration (3°C-5°C) or stored at room temperature (23°C-25°C). Conclusion: Isoproterenol hydrochloride diluted to a concentration of 4 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride for injection in ultraviolet light blocking bags was stable for 90 days at room temperature and under refrigeration.

Extended Stability of Vasopressin Injection in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags and Polypropylene Syringes and Its Impact on Critically Ill Patient Care and Medication Waste.

Background. Vasopressin is frequently utilized for a variety of shock states in critically ill patients. Short stability (≤24 hours) after intravenous admixture with current manufacturer labeling requires just in time preparation and may lead to delays in therapy and increased medication waste. We aimed to evaluate vasopressin stability in 0.9% sodium chloride stored in polyvinyl chloride bags and polypropylene syringes for up to 90 days. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of extended stability on the time to administration and cost savings from reduced medical waste at an academic medical center. Methods. Dilutions of vasopressin to concentrations of 0.4 and 1.0 unit/mL were performed under aseptic conditions. The bags and syringes were stored at room temperature (23°C-25°C) or under refrigeration (3°C-5°C). Three samples of each preparation and storage environment were analyzed on days 0, 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90. Physical stability was performed by visual examination. The pH was assessed at each point and upon final degradation evaluation. Sterility of the samples was not assessed. Chemical stability of vasopressin was evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were considered stable if there was <10% degradation of the initial concentration. Results. Vasopressin diluted to 0.4 and 1.0 unit/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection was physically stable throughout the study. No precipitation was observed. At days 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90 all bags and syringes diluted to 0.4 units/mL had <10% degradation. Vasopressin diluted to 1 unit/mL and stored under refrigeration had <10% degradation at all measured days, but when stored under room temperature was found to have >10% degradation at day 30. Implementation of a batching process resulted in reduced waste ($185 300) and improved time to administration (26 vs 4 minutes). Conclusion. Vasopressin diluted to a concentration of 0.4 units/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection is stable for 90 days at room temperature and under refrigeration. When diluted to 1.0 unit/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection it is stable for 90 days under refrigeration. Use of extended stability and sterility testing to batch prepare infusions may lead to improved time to administration and cost savings from reduced medication waste.

An Evaluation of the Effect of Catheter-Directed Continuous Infusion of Local Anesthetic by Elastomeric Pump on Opioid Usage Following Donor Kidney Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management following donor nephrectomy can prove challenging for immediate discharge on postoperative day 1 or 2. Although the standard for pain control is utilization of opioids, this increases the risk of postoperative ileus and, if continued inappropriately, increases excess opioids circulating in the community. One strategy that proposes to limit postoperative opioids in kidney donors is the continuous infusion of local anesthetics (CILA), though the effect on patient outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative CILA to decrease opioid usage in kidney donors who undergo laparoscopic nephrectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy and received CILA (CILA group) compared with kidney donors who received standard-of-care (SOC) postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was the mean total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) administered following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 176 kidney donors were evaluated, 88 in each group. The mean OME administered in the CILA group was significantly higher than in the SOC group: 194.8 versus 133.5 mg (P = 0.003). Mean total postoperative administration of acetaminophen was also increased in the CILA group: 3736.9 versus 2611.6 mg (P = 0.0041). Mean length of stay following surgery was higher in the kidney donors who received CILA, whereas return to bowel function, time to ambulation, and pain scores were not significantly different. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This report demonstrated that CILA is not an effective modality to reduce opioid utilization or improve recovery in kidney donors following laparoscopic nephrectomy.

A Retrospective Study of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy and Receiving Peri-Operative Naloxegol or Alvimopan: Comparison of Length of Stay.

Alvimopan is a µ-opioid receptor antagonist used in the post-operative period to decrease rates of post-operative ileus (POI) following radical cystectomy (RC) and thereby shorten length of stay (LOS). Naloxegol is a much less expensive drug of the same class that has yet to be studied for prevention of POI in the peri-operative period. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the differences in LOS and development of POI in patients post-RC who take alvimopan versus those who take naloxegol, with the hope that drug efficacy can be evaluated against the significant difference in cost burden between the two drugs. The study population included all adult patients between 18-89 years of age with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy with urostomy at University of Colorado Hospital. Those patients who received usual post-operative care as well as either alvimopan or naloxegol between September 2011 and December 2017 were selected for analysis. Patients who did not take either medication or were switched from one drug to the other were excluded from the study. A zero-truncated binomial regression analysis was used to analyze differences in length of stay in patients who received alvimopan versus those who received naloxegol. Additionally, the incidence of post-operative ileus was compared between treatment groups. 130 patients who underwent RC and received either alvimopan or naloxegol were included in the study: 75 (58%) received alvimopan and 55 (42%) received naloxegol. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between patients who received alvimopan and patients who received naloxegol after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, length of surgical time, or stage of disease (p = 0.41). There was no significant between the two drugs for development of POI (p = 0.85). Development of POI was significantly associated with a longer LOS (p = 0.007). The analysis showed that naloxegol was comparable to alvimopan when it came to length of hospital stay following RC. Therefore, naloxegol may be offered as a less expensive, effective alternative to alvimopan.

Extended Stability of Epinephrine Hydrochloride Injection in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags Stored in Amber Ultraviolet Light-Blocking Bags.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of epinephrine hydrochloride in 0.9% sodium chloride in polyvinyl chloride bags for up to 60 days. Methods: Dilutions of epinephrine hydrochloride to concentrations of 16 and 64 µg/mL were performed under aseptic conditions. The bags were then placed into ultraviolet light-blocking bags and stored at room temperature (23°C-25°C) or under refrigeration (3°C-5°C). Three samples of each preparation and storage environment were analyzed on days 0, 30, 45, and 60. Physical stability was performed by visual examination. The pH was assessed at baseline and upon final degradation evaluation. Sterility of the samples was not assessed. Chemical stability of epinephrine hydrochloride was evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography. To determine the stability-indicating nature of the assay, degradation 12 months following preparation was evaluated. Samples were considered stable if there was less than 10% degradation of the initial concentration. Results: Epinephrine hydrochloride diluted to 16 and 64 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and stored in amber ultraviolet light-blocking bags was physically stable throughout the study. No precipitation was observed. At days 30 and 45, all bags had less than 10% degradation. At day 60, all refrigerated bags had less than 10% degradation. Overall, the mean concentration of all measurements demonstrated less than 10% degradation at 60 days at room temperature and under refrigeration. Conclusion: Epinephrine hydrochloride diluted to 16 and 64 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection in polyvinyl chloride bags stored in amber ultraviolet light-blocking bags was stable up to 45 days at room temperature and up to 60 days under refrigeration.

Perioperative blood loss in total hip and knee arthroplasty: Outcomes associated with intravenous tranexamic acid use in an academic medical center.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials have reported decreased blood loss with the use of tranexamic acid during joint reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to assess the individual practice implications of tranexamic acid use in joint replacement surgery. METHODS: Health records of adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment group comprised patients who received intravenous tranexamic acid perioperatively. The control group comprised patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. RESULTS: Patients in the treatment group (n = 64) and the control group (n = 99) were well matched for demographics, orthopedic diagnosis, and comorbidities. In-hospital postsurgical mean decreases in hemoglobin concentrations were -4.05 g/dL and -4.94 g/dL in the treatment and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Postsurgical mean decreases in hematocrit levels were -11.2% and -14.2% in the treatment and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Three patients in the treatment group (5%) and 21 patients in the control group (21%) received red blood cell transfusions (p = 0.006). As compared to control, the relative risk of transfusion in the treatment group was 0.23 (95% confidence interval = 0.07-0.76) and the number needed to treat to avoid one transfusion was 7.0 (95% confidence interval = 3.8-14.4). No evidence of thromboembolism or other serious complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, perioperative administration of tranexamic acid was associated with diminished blood loss and lesser resource utilization.

Weight-based versus set dosing of vancomycin for coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to identify a preferred dosing strategy for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement surgery, or both were randomly assigned to receive either standard 1-g dosing with vancomycin before and after cardiopulmonary bypass or a single weight-based 20-mg/kg dose before surgery. The primary outcome was the percentage of time plasma concentrations were greater than 15 µg/mL during cardiopulmonary bypass and at surgical closure. Secondary outcomes included concentration of vancomycin in endothoracic tissue after vancomycin infusion, average time patients had vancomycin concentrations greater than 15 µg/mL, and vancomycin plasma and tissue pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the study dosing group (n = 10) and the standard dosing group (n = 10). From postinfusion to end of bypass, the median percentage of time vancomycin concentrations remained greater than 15 µg/mL was 100% (interquartile range [IQR], 72.6%-100%) for weight-based dosing versus 43.7% (IQR, 28.7%-53.4%) for standard dosing (P = .0005). From postinfusion to surgical closure, the percentage of time vancomycin concentrations remained greater than 15 µg/mL was significantly higher in the weight-based group (100% [IQR, 58.3%-100%] vs 34.6% [IQR, 25.3%-41.6%]; P = .0005). Weight-based dosing increased calculated time with vancomycin concentrations greater than 15 µg/mL and resulted in higher endothoracic tissue vancomycin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-based vancomycin dosing before coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement results in vancomycin concentrations greater than 15 µg/mL consistently more than does standard 1-g dosing.

Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids is frequently utilized for spinal surgery where somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) are monitored. Lidocaine infusions can contribute to antinociception and unconsciousness, thus allowing for a reduction in the total dose of propofol. We examined our recent experience with lidocaine infusions to quantify this effect. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of propofol usage in propofol-opioid TIVA (with and without lidocaine) for spine cases monitored with SSEP and tcMEP over a 7 months period. The propofol infusion rate, cortical amplitudes of the SSEP (median nerve, posterior tibial nerve), amplitudes and stimulation voltage of the tcMEP (adductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior) were evaluated. The savings of propofol and sufentanil were estimated based on utilization in 50 milliliter (ml) bottles and 5 ml ampules, respectively. 129 cases were evaluated. Propofol infusion rates were reduced with lidocaine infusion from an average of 115-99 µg/kg/min (p = 0.00038) and sufentanil infusions from an average of 0.36-0.29 µg/kg/h (p = 0.0059). This reduction in propofol infusion was also seen when the cases were divided into anterior cervical, posterior cervical, or posterior thoraco-lumbar procedures. No significant differences in the cortical SSEP or tcMEP amplitudes or the tcMEP stimulation voltages used were observed. No complications were associated with the use of the lidocaine infusion. The total estimated drug savings included 104 50 ml bottles of propofol and 5 5 ml ampules of sufentanil. These cases indicate that a lidocaine infusion can be effectively utilized in spine surgery with SSEP and tcMEP monitoring as a means to reduce propofol and sufentanil usage without a negative effect on the monitoring.